History of Gaming Essay Example for Free

History of Gaming Essay Gaming has been around since the late 1960’s far later than I had suspected, for me I had consistently felt that the Atari 2600 was the principal gaming framework in the world, and in the wake of beginning my examination I discovered how wrong I was. In this piece of the groups paper I will examine the various kinds of this innovation thought it history. In 1967 the main gaming console at any point was made and was named the â€Å"Brown Box.† A German conceived TV engineer Ralph Baer and his partners made the Brown Box which took a shot at your fundamental standard TV. Working with a firm called Sanders Associates, Baer alongside colleagues drew up schematics for a game which was known as the pursuit game, and they constructed a vacuum tube circuit that associated with the TV. Two players controlled two squares that fundamentally pursued each other on the screen, by then gaming was conceived. Baer and his partners later included a light fun and built up an aggregate of 12 games for the Brown Box. Quick forward five years after Baer and his partners made the Brown Box, Magnavox started creation of the Magnavox Odyssey. The Odyssey was known as the primary business computer game comfort and was advertised in Magnavox TV vendors. The Odyssey utilized six cartridges to play up to twelve games. The Odyssey ruin is that numerous TV vendors didn’t see any potential in it and alongside the bogus talk that it just worked in Magnavox TVs hurt the ubiquity of the gaming frameworks. In 1972 Nolan Bushnell established Atari and after three years in 1975, they had their first raving success with an arcade game called Pong. Atari sold a home adaptation of the game Pong through Sears under the Sears Tele-games mark. What made Pong one of a kind was that it delivered an on-screen score and sound all by single chip. With his first framework Nolan Bushnell and Atari shot to the highest point of family unit gaming. Realizing that some of nothing keep going forever particularly a solitary game framework prevalence, Nolan Bushnell and Atari began taking a shot at a cartridge based framework, one that could play different games. In 1976 Bushnell Sold Atari to Warner Communications, and Warner quickly upheld the Atari venture, and the Atari VCS later renamed the Atari 2600 was presente d. The Atari was a success and had numerous game hits to oblige it, hits like the ever well known Spaced Invaders, Breakout, Missile Command, and Combat just to give some examples. Atari was the first at any point massed delivered home video gaming framework, selling 400,000 frameworks and hitting marketing projections of $120 million dollars during the primary Christmas season in 1977. In 1980 Mattel discharged Intellivision, and was the first to take a run at Atari’s gamming tossed. This started what some might want to call a support war among Atari and Mattel. Intellivision highlighted better game designs and incorporated voices in computer games. The two frameworks welcomed on other game designers like Coleco and Activision, however with such a significant number of the games being unlicensed games and no family unit framework lead to gaming industry crash in 1983-84 reason in numerous organizations to petition for financial protection. Nintendo, a Japanese based organization turned out to be a piece of the gaming business in 1985 with its arrival of the Nintendo Entertainment System. With probably the most mainstream titles ever like Super Mario Brothers, Metroid, and Legend of Zelda and that of outsider games like Tecmo Bowl and RBI baseball, the NES turned the non-adherents that didn’t think it was a smart thought to get into gaming after an accident, into devotees. In 1987 Sega discharged its gaming framework which overshadowed the abilities that its antecedent, the NES, had advertised. It was known as the MasterSystem yet it didn’t make the sprinkle that numerous in the Sega camp had figured it would make, because of its absence of outsider games and different things it was the downfall of the MasterSystem and the main falling flat of Sega. Sega went straightforwardly back to the point where it all began and not long after discharged its initially hit the Sega Genesis in 1989. Supported by many game engineers like Electronic Arts, the Sega Genesis opened the entryway for the first since forever fight for matchless quality for gaming strength. Four years after the arrival of the Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo discharged its subsequent raving success, with the Gameboy. Gameboy was named the as the principal ever handheld gaming console and had a high contrast screen. Tetris one of the most mainstream Gameboy games ran the Gameboy deals through the rooftop. With many make-overs over the span of history Gameboy kept on remaining significant in gaming. 1990 was the arrival of SNK’s Neo-Geo a 24 piece home gaming framework that was supposed to be numerous years in front of its rivals and now is the right time. The Neo-Geo had one issue, it wasn’t 2-D designs those were incredible, it wasn’t its arcade level quality that was what everybody needed, it was neither of those two things that helped the Neo-Geo bomb it was its $650.00 sticker price and its $200.00 games that took the Neo-Geo from extraordinary development to under achiever. In 1991 Nintendo discharges the Super Nintendo Entertainment Syst em. Gotten the best of by Sega with its gaming framework the Sega Genesis, the 16 piece SNES made them make up for lost time to do. It wasn’t some time before the SNES on account of its innovative prevalence, had overwhelmed the Sega Genesis because of its large name games like Super Mario Brothers, Metroid, and Zelda. Before the finish of the 90’s Sega Genesis was close to an untimely idea for SNES who had assumed control over the 16 piece time and the gaming business. It wasn’t till the year 1995 that Nintendo again was tested for its gaming predominance. Sony presented the Sony PlayStation a 32 piece CD-ROM based innovation and has been supposed to be the most famous gaming framework ever. The games had three dimensional ongoing interaction obviously superior to the 2-D of the past. What was the most appreciation for any gamer was the cost of the games which drastically dropped contrasted with those of cartridge based games. It was additionally in 1995 the second day of September that the Sega establishment fundamentally began its end. This day denoted the arrival of the Sega Saturn, which was named the best most noticeably awful framework, as per many. Since it was pushed up to stretch out beyond the recently reported PlayStation 2, it gave the Sony company time to kick back and clean the forthcoming PlayStation 2 and gain from the slip-ups that the Sega Saturn was making. In 1996 the Nintendo establishment countered the PlayStation with the Nintendo64, the last cartridge based framework. In spite of the fact that the cartridges stacked quicker than the CD-ROMS of PlayStation the Nintendo64 couldn’t even stay aware of the measure of games that were discharged for the PlayStation, leaving the PlayStation on the gaming until further notice. It was in 1998 when Sega made its last push as a contender in the realm of gaming with its arrival of the CD-based framework Dreamcast, which consolidated a 128-piece preparing framework. The Dreamcast was the main framework that had a modem which took into consideration web availability that welcomed on the capacity to play on the web, download additional substance and refreshed to the framework itself. This would be the last time that anybody would here from the Sega establishment in the reassure business. In 2001 Sega stopped the Dreamcast and reported that it would leave the comfort advertise for good and taking its Sonic establishment with them. Four years after the arrival of the Nintendo64 and five years after the main introductory PlayStation, Sony discharges its second form of the PlayStation 2. The initial 128 piece framework included in reverse similarity permitting the PS2 to play the more established PlayStations games, and furthermore could be utilized as a DVD player. Not exclusively was the PS2 named most well known 128 piece framework yet with its discharge it denoted the ascent of support notoriety played over the web. 2001 was the presentation of th e old person with another framework and the newcomer in gaming. Nintendo hit the gaming market again leaving from its typical cartridge based frameworks and presenting its first historically speaking CD based framework. The GameCube was promoted more for the more youthful socioeconomics and is supposed to be what made the framework failure and undercut. Alongside the failure to associate with the web it was known as a one stunt horse and was behind in the gaming scene and home theater setups. The now tenderfoot Microsoft presented its own gaming framework the X-box. The PC monster utilized PC innovation when assembling the X-Box which considered more prominent execution. Despite the fact that the X-Box’s innovation demonstrated more noteworthy execution when contrasted with that of the 128 piece PS2 it despite everything stayed behind the quantity of deals that the PS2 had disregarding Sony at that top of the gaming scene. In 2002 Nintendo ventured back in with the Gameboy Advance and again in 2004 with the Nintendo DS. Some would contend and venture to state that all Nintendo did was step on its on toes with how they discharged the two forms so intently together. By doing so specialists say that they made the Gameboy outdated by discharging the DS unexpectedly early. Playstation before long joined Nintendo in the hand held gaming advancement, testing Nintendo’s strength. The PlayStation Portable like the Gameboy and DS included remote capacity, high designs and non-gaming capacities imitating PC-based gadgets. 2005 likewise denoted the arrival of the Microsoft X-Box 360. The handling intensity of the X-Box 360 was supposed to be unparalleled, and all accompanied an interior hard drive, played DVDs and had the capacity to associate four controllers one after another remotely, just as interfacing with the web. The Nintendo Wii was discharged in 2006 and highlighted an inherent WiFi for internet game play, remote controllers and Bluetooth. The remote controllers weren’t new to gaming however what Nintendo brought to the table with their remote controllers was the movement sensor innovation, permitting the game to mim

Philosophy of Leadership in Schools Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Theory of Leadership in Schools - Assignment Example The idea of authority in a school requires the head (overseer) to have the option to improve the understudies' presentation and bring different positive changes into the tutoring framework. All things considered, the school's manager ought to deal with the school in a manner that guarantees its endurance and advancement. All the activities and dangers of a school director ought to be in accordance with their forward-looking vision. This vision is created with the cooperation of showing staff as including them into the dynamic procedure guarantees their higher inspiration and lifts their imagination. It ought to be remembered that the proficient authority of the school director is not really conceivable without steady and beneficial relations with showing staff and successful arranging. While employing the instructors, the school head should ensure they are proficient and anxious to work with youngsters. So as to be a decent pioneer, the school head should actualize the right authority style. For the most part, three distinct styles of initiative are singled out - tyrant, equitable, and free enterprise. I accept that for the school head, the most ideal path is to be a vote based pioneer since it surmises a higher level of inclusion of showing staff individuals and understudies into the way toward taking choices, presenting developments and improving the working of school when all is said in done. Be that as it may, there are various perspectives to the extent acquainting changes with K-12 schools is concerned. From one viewpoint, there is an assessment that it is important to refresh the educational plan as an approach to modernize the school without any dangers with respect to educators and head. Then again, it is viewed as that the school, and the overseer at the primary spot, are the principle operators of progress. This subsequent methodology is all the more testing and requests from the chairman to take choices, anyway simultaneously it permits the school chief uncover their latent capacity, innovative capacities, limit, and it additionally necessitates that the executive is industrious, fearless, and anxious to develop.â â

Today I hit my TA with a door

Today I hit my TA with a door It wasnt like I meant to do it. I was late for recitation, and I usually go in the back door when Im late but today, TODAY for reasons still unknown to the universe I went for the front door, all while my TA just happened to be standing right there, going on about amide formation. And then I hit him with a door. HIM: AAHH!! ME: OH! Oh. UH. SORRY. Sorry. Im really sorry. Are you okay? HIM: Yeah. Sorry about that. ME: No no, Im really sorry. Errrrkk. Im going to.. uh, yeah. Sorry. You actually cant make this stuff up. It is against all the rules of absurdity (which I know because I wrote them). The only way it couldve possibly been worse is if Id maybe dropped through a trapdoor in the ceiling onto his head, terminating both his life and my dreams of graduating (as well as my reputation as being totally smooth at all times), or if my professor had instead been teaching the section (although he actually probably wouldve been cool with it, since the last time I saw him he was leaping around 54-100 like a gazelle in a WWF mask). Fortunately for me, he was already two minutes into his lecturing, so everyone in my recitation was well aware of the fact that I was a) late and b) now and forevermore a TA-assaulter. (If by some equally beautiful coincidence youre reading this now, Matt, I apologize again, and I would still like a reasonably good grade once the multiple contusions have healed.) Matt is not actually my TA, but I attend his section anyway because a) I have a conflict with the section that Im actually registered in and b) he presents material in clear, concise manner that supplements the lecture without being redundant (and Im not just saying that because I nearly hospitalized him today). I ended up there because Id attended a couple other sections and found his to be the most helpful, so I now attend his recitation twice a week. He is, by my standards, an excellent TA. Teaching 5.112 this semester has tuned me even more to the subtleties of what makes a good TA, though I would by no means put myself on the same standards of my brilliant, Canadian, zed-instead-of-z-using TA of the same subject last year (especially because some of my students read this hey, Alex!) Finding a good one is like many of the other life-changing decisions that await you come college life: trying to pick a school, a living group, a major you need to give different ones a shot, and you need to find which one fits you. Its a tricky matter that I have down to a concise science after a year of section-hopping, and is one of my most important and exhausting traditions come the start of a semester. So you wanna know the secret? The unwritten, unspoken truth? As long as you dont tell anyone, because the shock-value level of what youre about to learn is on a par with the Tooth Fairy not being real, or your high school econ teacher going to the same gym you do: being brilliant in a subject does, by no means, translate to being a good TA. The same goes for professors. I mean, sure. Theres a certain amount of knowledge on the subject they need to have in order to field your questions, and this by no means that the Nobel laureate/pioneer of programmed cell death isnt about to give you the most mind-blowing lecture of your life. But a lot of what makes someone a really effective teacher is not the raw, untapped genius found so commonly amongst the common MIT student: the never-gone-to-lecture-and-whats-a-TA-but-still-got-800,000%-on-the-last-exam guy who doesnt realize that his socks with sandals are not even fashionably acceptable to his World of Warcraft friends its the guy whos been there. The seasoned war veteran who knows exactly how you got confused, because he was you not too long ago, and how to get you out of that rut where youve gone so terribly awry that youve gotten your Hoffmann rearrangements mixed up with your Hoffmann eliminations and have turned your primary amide into a primary amine, so badly that your problem set is auditioning f or the Synthesis Gone Wild: Spring Term edition. (The organic chemistry analogies are not going away, so dont hold your breath.) Thankfully, theres a lot of that here too. We are all nerds, yes, but we nerd with style. A lot of us tend to think about things in ways that are twisted, unconventional, and often incorrect. Its what we came here to do. So I look for a couple things when Im TA-hunting (not in a Elmer Fudd kind of way, no matter what my current record might suggest): firstly, someone who knows their stuff, but not in a way that when you ask how you figure out one aspect of the problem, theyll respond, You just do. One TA I tried out this year walked into class and loudly proclaimed, I dont mind if you dont come to my recitation. I never did when I took this class. I didnt return to his section. Actually, I dropped that class in favor of one I found more interesting, in which my TA is so popular that I once came ten minutes late for and had to sit on the floor. Which isnt AT ALL to say that I dropped it because of that first guy, but a really good TA can totally change your opinion of a subject, just like your favorite high school calculus teacher was the driving force behind you learning to stop worrying and love the Lagrange error. Secondly: someone who doesnt spend too much time regurgitating what was discussed in lecture. The way the majority of MIT classes work, which I probably shouldve discussed earlier for new readers, is lecture/recitation format: one hour of lecture, taught by a professor, which can have anywhere from 30 students in a small, major-only class to 200+ students in a General Institute Requirement (GIR) class, and one hour of recitation, taught by grad students or occasionally undergrads, and is usually attended by 20-30 students each. You are free to add a section as your schedule and the size of that section permits, which is something that I enjoy greatly (as I make it not only a point to check out the different options, but also to write a blog entry advertising how sweet it is that I get to pick my instructor). And its important to find someone whose style benefits you the most, so you can get the most out of the class. The purpose of the recitation is to supplement lecture, not recite all the material in exactly the same way. Practice problems are always helpful too, especially in the context of particularly difficult problem sets that you have no idea how to start. I also tend to prefer undergraduate TAs, because grad students can come from anywhere and have such a drastically different background from MIT students not that they dont have to really know their stuff to be an MIT grad student, but undergrads have actually taken the class in question and are well-versed in the format and intricacies of the material. At the same time, undergraduate TAs are also dealing with workloads of their own, UROPs, extracurricular activities, relationship problems, lack of sleep, indigestion from the leftover Chinese food they forgot to refrigerate but ate for lunch anyway, or any of a number of common problems undergrads suffer from. So theres that as well. In general, there are a number of other personal preferences I have towards TAs. I like people who give notes, people who are organized and have a clear structure to their hour of time, and people who arent apt to give away the answer in an obvious manner. Theyre not hard to find if you dont mind looking, and they can change your outlook on a course entirely. But other traits are important to other people; its just a matter of what matters to you and how you learn. Though thats something youll have to pick up on yourself. My strongest inclination, though, has always been towards people with a good sense of humor. That way, when you smash into them in the hallway and spill your soup all over their new white blouse, or accidentally ram into them with a door, youll know you can probably, maybe still pull off a B. Probably. Maybe if you write them a blog entry.

What Is Ethics Ethics Or Morals - 2293 Words

What is ethics? Ethics or morals are rules for distinguish between right and wrong, a code of professional conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. Most of our societies also have legal rules that govern behaviour but ethical norms tend to be border and more informal that laws .An action may be legal but unethical Aim of ethical Guidance The aim of the guidelines is to allow the researcher’s or individual to make ethical judgements and decisions to be informed by shared values and experience. At times principles will have to be made. This guidelines help on to build on legal or policies or the best practice principles. Some of the ethical principals ïÆ'Ëœ Honesty Always use honesty in all communications. Honest report data, results, methods and procedures, and publication status. Do not make, falsify, or misrepresent data. Never deceive colleagues, research sponsors, or the public. ïÆ'Ëœ Objectivity Try to avoid bias in experimental design, data analysis, data interpretation, peer review, personnel decisions, grant writing, expert testimony, and other aspects of research where objectivity is expected or required. ïÆ'Ëœ Integrity Keeping your promises and agreements, acting with sincerity there should be consistency of thought and action. ïÆ'Ëœ Carefulness Avoiding careless errors and negligence, carefully and critically examine your own work and the work of your peers. Keeping good records of research activities, such as data collection, researchShow MoreRelatedWhat are Morals and Ethics?963 Words   |  4 PagesTuskegee Experiment What does morals and ethics mean? Morals are basically a persons standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. And ethics are a persons standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. A person is always trying to have good morals and to always be ethical. One of the most controversial ethical and moral dilemmas is the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. This is said to be one of the most morallyRead MoreEthic And Moral Conflict Implied. What Are The Implications936 Words   |  4 PagesEthic And Moral Conflict Implied What are the implications of ethics or moral conflicts with one another? There is a fine line and some ongoing confusion between ethics and morals. Ethics apply to institutions or groups for example doctors or lawyers. Morals are personal principals influenced by society. Professionals deal with the conflict between ethics and morals more often than we realize. A lawyer who has a high moral standard would absolutely defend her moral belief that defending a murdererRead MoreEthics Embody The Moral Principles Of What Is Right Or1893 Words   |  8 Pages Ethics embody the moral principles of what is right or wrong that govern the conduct of a person and the actions of an organization. I strongly believe that it is of paramount importance for a person or business organization to have a strong sense of ethics since every decision made can have positive or negative outcomes. In the beginning of my professional career, I would like to work in a multinational enterprise that has strong and definite business ethics because having high ethical standardsRead MoreNormative Ethics: Society Determines What Moral and Ethical Act or Action is Correct and Acceptable1446 Words   |  6 PagesNormative ethics are those ethical principles and values that are considered morally correct and express principles of good character, actions that are viewed as right rather than wrong and are commonly accepted and reasonable. The prompt in this assignment refers to the requirement of â€Å"the existence of normative† requiring the practice of normati ve ethics in how individuals and society determine what moral and ethical act or action is correct and acceptable. Normative ethics embraces the philosophicalRead MoreMoral Wisdom Seems to Be as Little Connected to Knowledge of Ethical Theory as Playing Good Tennis Is to Knowledge of Physics (Emrys Westacott). to What Extent Should Our Actions Be Guided by Our Theories in Ethics and Elsewhere?1737 Words   |  7 PagesMoral wisdom seems to be as little connected to knowledge of ethical theory as playing good tennis is to knowledge of physics (Emrys Westacott). To what extent should our actions be guided by our theories in ethics and elsewhere? The question is with regards to whether moral reasoning is more accurate compared to the -theory-based knowledge of science. I think that ethical theory should be used for our moral conduct while the sciences should be used in other areas of knowledge instead. ThusRead MoreMorals and Ethics1023 Words   |  5 PagesMorals and Ethics in Society Kalob Lisk Rasmussen College Author Note This paper is being submitted on July 14, 2016, for Thomas Santangelo’s B406 Business Law and Ethical Behavior course. Morals and Ethics in Society Morals and ethics in society play major roles in our lives and our work environments and I am more than happy to write this research paper to help explain the similarities and its key differences. And this research paper will also include where both morals and ethicsRead MoreThe Difference between Morals and Ethics818 Words   |  3 PagesMorals and Ethics Many people use the words â€Å"ethical† and â€Å"moral† as descriptive words interchangeably. However, ethics and morals are dissimilar from one another, for there are many factors that differentiate one from the other. Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Potter Stewart once stated, â€Å"There is a big difference between what we have the right to do, and what is right. This statement alone encompasses the general distinction between ethics and morals. Morals, as definedRead MoreEthics : Ethics And Morality1476 Words   |  6 Pagesuniversal on ethics and morality. Ethics among different cultures is so vast, even though every culture does have a standard for ethics which they live by. Although ethics is a broad human universal, there is no specific universal ethic. Each world religion holds a different ethic as their highest ethic; it is always a case by case basis. Theory: Ethics serve as an adaptive function in modern environment, more than ever. As society evolves, the standard of ethics also increases. Ethics is a traitRead MoreComparison Between Deontological And Teleological Approaches1276 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction to Ethics essay Essay Question- â€Å"Compare and contrast deontological and teleological approaches to ethics†. At its simplest form, ethics can be defined as a system of moral principles. They affect how people make choices and lead their lives. Ethics are concerned with what is good for individuals (BBC , 2014). The term ethics comes from the Greek word ethikos, meaning ‘character’. It may be translated as ‘custom’ or ‘usage’ (Bowie Frye, 2008, p.2). There are three main types of ethics; normativeRead MoreEthics Paper1177 Words   |  5 PagesEthics Paper Week 1 Assignment Rheana Willis 01/08/2012 Dilemma Choice 2: A married couple, both addicted to drugs, are unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years pass. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their

Euthyphro, By Plato The Main Idea That Comes Up Is...

Seiji Hayashi PHIL 3500 Chrisoula Andreou In Euthyphro, by Plato the main idea that comes up is socratic ignorance. Euthyphro argues that he is the self proclaimed expert on the subject of piety and impiety. I could argue in the position that, Euthyphro is claiming expertise in a subject that he doesn t know enough about. This socratic ignorance is the idea of the dialogue. I have decided to take an extra argument in this paper. I argue there is ignorance in both Socrates and Euthyphro. Although it s more difficult to prove, I explain the situations of piety and impiety and how it is relative to each person and the time period of the discussion. Bringing the background situation to show claims made by Euthyphro and lack of evidence provided in this dialogue. The supporting claims I share after are on Euthyphro’s side of conversation. This determines his thoughts, on the definition of piety and unspoken details that I have determined. Socrates also makes arguments that are known to be true, to Euthyph ro through comparison of different circumstances. This happens through Socrates and Euthyphro, use of asking questions and questing answer, from what explained, based on the knowledge of Euthyphro. I use the background of the whole dialogue, in pointing out flaws in the responses of both parties. I also bring into aspect of the circumstance relative to the time period, and the nature of people s beliefs, in religion. The background of the dialogue the important to theShow MoreRelatedThe Republic And The Socratic Dialogue1769 Words   |  8 Pagesand the Socratic dialogue Euthyphro we can conclude that there are a lot similarities and differences in the arguments between Socrates and Thrasymachus and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both pieces and arguments have similar tones and shows how Plato, through Socrates, would get to the bottom of certain issues. Upon entering the house In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates didn’t know what he was walking into when the discussion of justice was brought up. The main question that had been brought up was whatRead MoreSocrates and Properties Essay3228 Words   |  13 Pagesignorant and wise, he presents us with one of the most striking paradoxes. Like so many of the other philosophers, is provocative in that its apparent self-contradiction hides an important idea for us readers to discover. Though out this text Socrates ignorance results from his belief that he has no knowledge of moral idea, or moral properties, such as justice, virtue, piety, and beauty. He asserts that, if only he knew the relevant definitions, he would be a moral expert who could answer philosophicalRead MoreThe Trial of Socrates: an Analysis and Construction of Socrates Defense2369 Words   |  10 Pagesphilosophical advancements. Athens could very well be divided, morally on various aspects, one of them being which â€Å"political† affiliation Athenians related themselves with. Some choices were between the Traditionalists, Sophists or an up and coming ideas of Socratics or Platonics. Militarily, during the life of Socrates, Athens was involved in the Peloponnesian Wars, a set of conflicts between Sparta and Athens, in which Athens ultimately loses. Historically, this time became known as the rule ofRead MoreHow Wisdom Has Impacted My Education And My Ultimate Relationship With It2482 Words   |  10 Pagesrelationship with it. There are five units that we have addressed in the course. The first in regards to wisdom and Socratic ignorance. One of the passages is from the Five Dialogues text and focuses on the written accounts of the great Greek philosopher Socrates in his search for ultimate wisdom. His life stories are predominately documented by his students Plato and Xenophon. Plato is one of his most renowned students and would go on to teach Aristotle. Socrates was born in Athens, Greece and inRead MoreSocratic Ethics Essay2636 Words   |  11 Pagesspecifically in the readings, Euthyphro, the Apology, the Crito and the Phaedo. Socrates’ main question was â€Å"What is the good life?† and his pursuit was to find out how to live this â€Å"good life†. Socrates’ pursuit of the â€Å"good life† helped him to identify knowledge with virtue. He equated knowledge with good or virtue and ignorance with bad or evil. Since no one would knowingly harm themselves, if harm came to a person, then that person must have acted in ignorance. This led him to the thought

How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same Free Essays

I’m pretty sure all of us are familiar with the cliche, â€Å"money can’t buy happiness. † In Gregg Easterbrook book The Progress Paradox he tries to understand why a small variances of this cliche is so. The paradox that underlies Easterbrook’s venture is that through out the last fifty years, things have improved in the United States and Europe, by all objective standards. We will write a custom essay sample on How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same or any similar topic only for you Order Now All though during same time, surveys of happiness and satisfaction have not changed since the fifties. Easterbrook’s main question through out the book asking has the objective measures of the well being of man kind increased while overall satisfaction of people and happiness have remained constant? In the three beginning chapters of this book Easterbrook spends a lot of time looking at surveys depicting the various objective measures that show a pretty much steady increase of progress. I found these chapters entertaining to read because it brings to light a huge range of facts and statistics that add support to his idea that things are constantly improving. Easterbrook goes on about how the crime rate is falling, the state of the environment is improving, we are gaining intelligence, equality is increasing and economic situations have improved. Crime, both violent and property have been in decline for 20 years. Current crime rates are probably the lowest in the history of the country. The environment has been improving in every area except green house gases. We have the cleanest air since the beginning of the industrial revolution and the cleanest water since Man was a hunter and gatherer. n the statistics discussed, Easterbrook references a 1996 poll that resulted in 52% of the respondents saying the United States was worse now than when their parents were growing up and 60% said they expected their children to live in an even worse country. Only 15% of the respondents believed that overall national conditions were improving (Easterbrook, 2004). In 1997, 66% of Americans reported that they believed â€Å"the lot of the average person is getting worse† (Easterbrook, 2004). Easterbrook raises the question â€Å"How is this possible† with the dramatic increase in overall general progress. Along with discussing the statistics of the many surveys, Easterbrook also gives the reader possible reasons for the so-called paradox. One of the possible reasons he gives is â€Å"choice anxiety. † When looking back on the past a lot of people had very few options due to limited income and limited availability of goods and services. But Easterbrook fights that there is flip side to the stress that comes from having to many options, just like not having enough options can be stressful as well. With the constant increase in the range of goods and services available even the easiest choices can become stressful. Easterbrook states this because a consumer can never really be sure if they are making the correct decision causing stress and unhappiness. Another possible reason Easterbrook gives is â€Å"Abundance denial. † This means that no matter how much individuals actually have materially, they will never view them as being â€Å"well-off†, which is constantly making people unhappy and stress out. Easterbrook states that a most Americans think of only the rich as being â€Å"well-off. This brings me to my favorite statistic my favorite statistic: there have been around sixty billion people who ever lived, the 600 million who live in western democracies such as Europe, North America, Japan and Australia live better than anyone else in history (better housing, medical care, nutrition etc. )(Easterbrook, 2004). Since my standard of living is considered about ave rage that means that I live better than 99. 5% of people who have ever lived. We are the one percenters, as far as the history of the world goes. Our current one percenters live better than 99. 9% of people, ever. One more possible reason is â€Å"collapse anxiety,† the widespread fear that the prosperity of the United States and Europe may come to an end due to an economic crash, environmental problems, terrorism or some other catastrophe. Even though individuals are better off that constant notion that it is unmanageable leads to people being unhappy and unsatisfied. It’s hard for people to sit back and really appreciate things when they are in constant fear that it could someday end. Lastly he considers â€Å"the revolution of satisfied expectations† as a possible explanation. He refers this to as the uneasiness that follows items that an individual once dreamed of having. Easterbrook states that during the last century western life has been categorized by ever increasing expectations, with each generation expecting to have more than the previous generation. In today’s day and age we have reached a point where people have most of what they need. What Easterbrook is trying to say with this explanation is that it is hard to imagine things getting any better than they already are kind of giving individuals nothing to look forward to. After reading this book I had some general issues. First off is the issue of happiness. The beginning of the book deals with objective measures over time that forms a steady increase in progress. To form the paradox the objective facts were compared to the subjective measures of happiness. Of course Easterbrook states that the surveys are not exactly perfect he claims that they â€Å"illuminating nonetheless† (Easterbrook, 2004). However I think this is questionable. The perception of happiness is not constant among individuals at one point in time, let alone over several decades. Each person could have a completely different outlook on happiness. What can be happiness for one person could be sadness or another feeling for someone else. With each person entitled to their own subjective view on what they consider to be happiness, they are also entitled to have a subjective perception of what others experienced in the past and what others will experience in the future. So when surveyors asked respondents if they thought their parents would better off or if their children will be better off, it’s not an objective measure but a subjective perception of the past and future. It doesn’t seem clear why we In short, it is not clear why we would assume the level of subjective satisfaction to increase with objective well-being. I feel like Easterbrook was trying to say that in the past it seemed like things were always getting better but now in the future since things are improving so quickly it doesn’t seem like we could continue to progress in the future. It is unclear why people should think that progress couldn’t continue and, therefore, have lower expectations for the future. This question is left unanswered. If you asked, most people would agree that money and material things are not the meaning of happiness. With this, why would we expect to see a connection between an increase in progress and an increase in happiness? It isn’t clear that the claim has ever been that prosperity and progress will lead to the end of all stress and uneasiness. In the end there are two traits that correlate closely with happiness: forgiveness and gratitude. Forgive those that have done you wrong and be grateful for what you have. †¢Easterbrook, Greg. The Progress Paradox: How Life Gets Better While People Feels Worse. Random House Publishing Group, 2004. eBook. How to cite How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same, Essay examples

How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same Free Essays

I’m pretty sure all of us are familiar with the cliche, â€Å"money can’t buy happiness. † In Gregg Easterbrook book The Progress Paradox he tries to understand why a small variances of this cliche is so. The paradox that underlies Easterbrook’s venture is that through out the last fifty years, things have improved in the United States and Europe, by all objective standards. We will write a custom essay sample on How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same or any similar topic only for you Order Now All though during same time, surveys of happiness and satisfaction have not changed since the fifties. Easterbrook’s main question through out the book asking has the objective measures of the well being of man kind increased while overall satisfaction of people and happiness have remained constant? In the three beginning chapters of this book Easterbrook spends a lot of time looking at surveys depicting the various objective measures that show a pretty much steady increase of progress. I found these chapters entertaining to read because it brings to light a huge range of facts and statistics that add support to his idea that things are constantly improving. Easterbrook goes on about how the crime rate is falling, the state of the environment is improving, we are gaining intelligence, equality is increasing and economic situations have improved. Crime, both violent and property have been in decline for 20 years. Current crime rates are probably the lowest in the history of the country. The environment has been improving in every area except green house gases. We have the cleanest air since the beginning of the industrial revolution and the cleanest water since Man was a hunter and gatherer. n the statistics discussed, Easterbrook references a 1996 poll that resulted in 52% of the respondents saying the United States was worse now than when their parents were growing up and 60% said they expected their children to live in an even worse country. Only 15% of the respondents believed that overall national conditions were improving (Easterbrook, 2004). In 1997, 66% of Americans reported that they believed â€Å"the lot of the average person is getting worse† (Easterbrook, 2004). Easterbrook raises the question â€Å"How is this possible† with the dramatic increase in overall general progress. Along with discussing the statistics of the many surveys, Easterbrook also gives the reader possible reasons for the so-called paradox. One of the possible reasons he gives is â€Å"choice anxiety. † When looking back on the past a lot of people had very few options due to limited income and limited availability of goods and services. But Easterbrook fights that there is flip side to the stress that comes from having to many options, just like not having enough options can be stressful as well. With the constant increase in the range of goods and services available even the easiest choices can become stressful. Easterbrook states this because a consumer can never really be sure if they are making the correct decision causing stress and unhappiness. Another possible reason Easterbrook gives is â€Å"Abundance denial. † This means that no matter how much individuals actually have materially, they will never view them as being â€Å"well-off†, which is constantly making people unhappy and stress out. Easterbrook states that a most Americans think of only the rich as being â€Å"well-off. This brings me to my favorite statistic my favorite statistic: there have been around sixty billion people who ever lived, the 600 million who live in western democracies such as Europe, North America, Japan and Australia live better than anyone else in history (better housing, medical care, nutrition etc. )(Easterbrook, 2004). Since my standard of living is considered about ave rage that means that I live better than 99. 5% of people who have ever lived. We are the one percenters, as far as the history of the world goes. Our current one percenters live better than 99. 9% of people, ever. One more possible reason is â€Å"collapse anxiety,† the widespread fear that the prosperity of the United States and Europe may come to an end due to an economic crash, environmental problems, terrorism or some other catastrophe. Even though individuals are better off that constant notion that it is unmanageable leads to people being unhappy and unsatisfied. It’s hard for people to sit back and really appreciate things when they are in constant fear that it could someday end. Lastly he considers â€Å"the revolution of satisfied expectations† as a possible explanation. He refers this to as the uneasiness that follows items that an individual once dreamed of having. Easterbrook states that during the last century western life has been categorized by ever increasing expectations, with each generation expecting to have more than the previous generation. In today’s day and age we have reached a point where people have most of what they need. What Easterbrook is trying to say with this explanation is that it is hard to imagine things getting any better than they already are kind of giving individuals nothing to look forward to. After reading this book I had some general issues. First off is the issue of happiness. The beginning of the book deals with objective measures over time that forms a steady increase in progress. To form the paradox the objective facts were compared to the subjective measures of happiness. Of course Easterbrook states that the surveys are not exactly perfect he claims that they â€Å"illuminating nonetheless† (Easterbrook, 2004). However I think this is questionable. The perception of happiness is not constant among individuals at one point in time, let alone over several decades. Each person could have a completely different outlook on happiness. What can be happiness for one person could be sadness or another feeling for someone else. With each person entitled to their own subjective view on what they consider to be happiness, they are also entitled to have a subjective perception of what others experienced in the past and what others will experience in the future. So when surveyors asked respondents if they thought their parents would better off or if their children will be better off, it’s not an objective measure but a subjective perception of the past and future. It doesn’t seem clear why we In short, it is not clear why we would assume the level of subjective satisfaction to increase with objective well-being. I feel like Easterbrook was trying to say that in the past it seemed like things were always getting better but now in the future since things are improving so quickly it doesn’t seem like we could continue to progress in the future. It is unclear why people should think that progress couldn’t continue and, therefore, have lower expectations for the future. This question is left unanswered. If you asked, most people would agree that money and material things are not the meaning of happiness. With this, why would we expect to see a connection between an increase in progress and an increase in happiness? It isn’t clear that the claim has ever been that prosperity and progress will lead to the end of all stress and uneasiness. In the end there are two traits that correlate closely with happiness: forgiveness and gratitude. Forgive those that have done you wrong and be grateful for what you have. †¢Easterbrook, Greg. The Progress Paradox: How Life Gets Better While People Feels Worse. Random House Publishing Group, 2004. eBook. How to cite How Life Gets Better While People Feel the Same, Essay examples